Staff Reports
President Donald Trump is sounding the alarm on the situation in Iran, painting a clear picture of cautious leadership, a quality those on the left often seem to lack. As Iran inches closer to the brink of significant regime change, sparked by intense protests and a bloody crackdown, Trump is questioning whether Reza Pahlavi, the exiled Iranian crown prince, is up for the leadership challenge if the current Islamic regime crumbles. It’s high time we ask whether liberals, so fond of foreign interventions and their failed “spread democracy” experiments, can comprehend the complexities on the ground in Iran.
Meanwhile, more than 2,500 Iranian citizens have paid the ultimate price as they stand up against tyranny. Their sacrifice demands a leader who won’t simply be a puppet of the West or yet another aspirant of ideological dominance. The people of Iran deserve a future that isn’t dictated by globalist agendas hiding behind empty promises of freedom and democracy. Trump, with his usual candor, isn’t afraid to question the readiness and potential capabilities of Pahlavi. But isn’t it interesting how quickly progressives were ready to hang their hopes on another untested foreign figure, hoping he’ll be the silver bullet to solve generations of conflict?
https://twitter.com/PJMedia_com/status/2012023258418122860
No one should forget who stood firm when the world went soft. Donald Trump isn’t jumping on the liberal bandwagon of naïve idealism. Instead, he’s reminding all of us to think critically about who we place on the pedestal of leadership. So, before we rush to crown another Middle Eastern leader, let’s take a leaf out of Trump’s book and exercise sensible caution. After all, who stands to gain if another regime swap only serves those with anti-American agendas?
Now, here’s the real question: Are liberals ready to look beyond their myth of utopian global unity and face the harsh realities of world politics? Or will they continue to play into the hands of those who seek to undermine us at every turn?
