Staff Reports
In a thrilling revelation reminiscent of a Cold War espionage thriller, it appears that President Trump has finally decided to pull back the curtain on what really happened in the assassination of John F. Kennedy. An astounding 64,000 pages of redacted government documents have been declassified, much to the delight of conspiracy theorists and history buffs alike. Among the juicy tidbits are insights into Lee Harvey Oswald’s connection to the Soviet Union and the CIA’s overreaching ambitions that may have been more melodrama than oversight.
Amongst the documents is a trove of bureaucratic correspondence as riveting as watching paint dry. It supposedly includes a letter addressed to none other than Senator Joseph R. Biden, where someone apparently impersonated the late John F. Kennedy Jr. to deliver a vague insult. It is hard not to chuckle at the imagination that someone thought it would be a brilliant prank to pen a missive calling Biden a “traitor” while channeling a deceased political figure. Apparently for Biden, a man who loves to bask in the light of his own importance, being named a “victim” by the FBI was just another Tuesday.
In an era where every minute detail of public life is scrutinized, come revelations about foreign intelligence will most likely raise more questions than they answer. A letter by a man named Sergyj Czornonoh claims he warned the U.S. government about Oswald’s plans, only to be shrugged off like a forgotten homework assignment. If nothing else, this suggests that the government would rather flop around cluelessly than act on credible warnings – what could go wrong?
The 10 big revelations in the secret JFK assassination fileshttps://t.co/VAuOROPcKc pic.twitter.com/XSLGUB6kau
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) March 20, 2025
The infamous Warren Commission concluded that Oswald acted alone, which many view with skepticism, particularly after it came to light that the KGB had their own files on him and found his marksmanship rather lacking. One might think that the Soviets would have serious doubts about their “assassin,” especially considering he couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn. Oswald’s domestic life didn’t sound any more promising; his wife apparently kept him on a tight leash, which, let’s face it, doesn’t offer much comfort if you’re the one who has to worry about being shot.
In yet another twist, former CIA agent Gary Underhill supposedly stated that a “small clique within the CIA” was responsible for JFK’s assassination. After sharing this explosive claim, Underhill tragically turned up deceased. Coincidence? Accidental suicide? Or merely another casualty in the web of governmental intrigue? The official narrative is thin as a paper mache mask, and tales like this only serve to deepen the divide between what is presented as “truth” and what people suspect is the reality.
As the layers of this historical onion are peeled back, it becomes evident that the more things change, the more they stay the same. Despite the dramatic revelations that intertwine Oswald, the CIA, and a cast of characters ‘not suitable for prime time’, is it any wonder that the American public remains wary of its government? Transparency could be the guiding light leading to truth, yet history suggests the preferred method is to keep the lights dim and the populace confused.
