Staff Reports
A former official with USAID has raised the alarm over rampant corruption within the agency, claiming that Democrats have been the main beneficiaries of government funding that has strayed far from its intended purpose. Mark Moyar, who served as the director of the Office of Civilian-Military Cooperation during Trump’s first term, has shared troubling insights into how taxpayer dollars are not just being lost to waste, but are frequently directed to initiatives that would make any right-minded American cringe.
The Trump administration has quickly recognized that many of the projects funded by USAID—like contraceptive distribution in Afghanistan and LGBTQ diversity programs in Europe—highlight the urgent need for a complete re-evaluation of foreign aid practices. This isn’t just about cutting the fat; it’s about slicing right through the bureaucracy that has long been breeding grounds for mismanagement and partisan favoritism. Under Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s leadership, there’s a concerted effort to trim USAID’s workforce by the thousands while also rooting out the problematic initiatives that have been festering for years.
Former USAID official warns of corruption in agency, says Democrats benefited https://t.co/4HtktcPOrL
— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) February 11, 2025
According to Moyar, one of the biggest issues plaguing USAID has been a cloak of secrecy that protects not only inefficacy, but also downright corruption. In an environment where Congress struggles to extract vital information, look no further than the opaque processes that allow bureaucrats to hide their tracks. His remarks suggest that without this drastic overhaul, the real scale of waste, fraud, and abuse might remain hidden beneath a murky surface far too long. Everyone knows that when the government gets involved, the likelihood of a sound investment goes down dramatically.
Past efforts to reform USAID during the initial Trump administration were stymied by malfeasance at the top, seeping deep into the organization’s psyche. According to Moyar, some officials were closely tied to lobbying efforts that benefitted the very industries supposedly being monitored for accountability. This inexplicable nexus of power demonstrates the perverse incentives that have long dogged the agency. Now, with a fresh approach, the Trump administration aims to allow evidence-based scrutiny over these expenditures to determine what is truly beneficial for the American taxpayer.
Moyar’s experiences have revealed that funding often finds its way into the hands of Democrats, who have historically maintained crucial influence over these contracts. Reports of how public funding is funneled to NGOs that echo left-wing ideologies reveal an uncomfortable truth: a significant portion of USAID’s budget appears to be used less for altruistic purposes and more for political payoffs. The sheer amount of taxpayer money absorbed by organizations that promote social agendas raises legitimate questions about where American interests truly lie.
The left’s infiltration of USAID’s spending priorities is becoming alarmingly obvious. Whether the focus is on diversity initiatives or politically charged consulting contracts, the evidence suggests these agencies have strayed far from their core mission of aiding the less fortunate around the globe. As the Trump administration takes decisive action to revitalize USAID, it remains to be seen how the agency’s future will be shaped—hopefully, with a focus on genuine assistance rather than ideological pandering that does nothing but enrich those already thriving in a system that has gone off the rails.
