Staff Reports
In yet another twist in the ongoing drama on the world stage, former President Donald Trump didn’t hold back his feelings about reports of an alleged Ukrainian drone strike on Russian leader Vladimir Putin’s residence. While some would sit idly by and whisper diplomatic nothings, Trump boldly calls out what this potential strike represents: an almost reckless escalation and a distraction from what the media and liberal elites have been trying to ignore.
This incident came to Trump’s attention straight from Putin himself, dispelling any media delusions about conspiracy theories. While Democrats and their globalist pals might salivate over increased conflict, the real question here is why Ukraine would even think about provoking Russia directly in this way. Or did they? The situation remains murky, with heightened accusations and counteraccusations flying.
NEW: President Trump reacts to the alleged strike on President Putin's residence:
"I don't like it. It's not good…It's one thing to be offensive because they're offensive. It's another thing to attack his house…I learned about it from President Putin and I was very angry… pic.twitter.com/WxThNaBiiy
— Fox News (@FoxNews) December 29, 2025
Meanwhile, Trump’s approach is one of caution. He understands the difference between defending freedom and pushing the world to the brink of chaos. This is not the time to ignite further tensions with rash bombardments, especially when U.S. interests hang in the balance. The decision to halt Tomahawk missile shipments underscores Trump’s commitment to a sensible strategy, rather than knee-jerk reactions that some in Washington would jump at.
Zelensky and Ukraine are quick to deny the attack, claiming it’s all fabricated by Putin to disrupt peace negotiations. Will the Biden administration play along with these games, or will they learn from Trump’s direct approach in pursuit of a genuine path to peace? As it stands, the anti-American left continues to favor narratives that ultimately serve their agendas, playing fast and loose with international stability.
When will we see sensible leadership return to address these pressing issues? Trump’s strong, common-sense views highlight what’s needed in today’s turbulent world. Shouldn’t we question why the media, with their anti-conservative bias, aren’t more concerned with these dangerous provocations? Who truly stands for peace, and who is merely exploiting chaos for political gain?
