Staff Reports
Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, the judge presiding over former President Trump’s charges regarding the 2020 presidential election, has a family history that is raising eyebrows among conservatives. It turns out that Judge Chutkan’s family has a deep-rooted connection to Marxist revolutionary activities in Jamaica. Talk about a coincidence, or is it?
The judge assigned to former President Trump’s multiple indictments stemming from his efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election is the scion of a family of revolutionary Marxists in her native Jamaica.https://t.co/jaFtOhtxTn
— MAGA War Room (@MAGAIncWarRoom) August 28, 2023
According to the New York Post, Judge Chutkan’s grandfather, Frank Hill, was a communist revolutionary in Jamaica who even found himself in a spot of trouble during World War II. Frank and his brother Ken were suspected of engaging in “subversive activities” and were briefly incarcerated by the British governor of the island. Apparently, being a revolutionary runs in the family!
Now, I’m not one to judge a person based on their family history, but it’s certainly worth noting when it comes to a judge overseeing a case that has such significant political implications. It’s a bit like appointing a fox to guard the henhouse, don’t you think?
But that’s not all. Judge Chutkan has also faced accusations of political bias in her role. Conservative firebrand Rep. Matt Gaetz recently introduced a resolution seeking to censure and investigate her for her “open bias and partisanship.” Gaetz specifically referenced Chutkan’s past support for Black Lives Matter protesters and her alleged lamentation over former President Trump’s freedom.
It’s no surprise that Judge Chutkan was appointed by President Obama. She was handing out donations left and right, with $1,500 going straight to Obama’s campaign between 2008 and 2009. I wonder if that sweet contribution had anything to do with her appointment. Hmmm…
Furthermore, Judge Chutkan seems to have a rather interesting take on the events of January 6th. While she may be tough on those involved, she sees it as an attempt to overthrow the government rather than a riot carried out by unarmed extremists. Now, I’m not defending what happened on January 6th, but to compare it to the Black Lives Matter protests, where actual lives were lost, seems like a false equivalence.
It’s troubling to think that someone who seems to have such a biased view of the events has been given the power to decide the fate of a presidential election. With all due respect to Judge Chutkan, it’s hard to have faith in a fair and impartial judgment when the person overseeing the case has such a storied family history and a clear political bias.
Let’s hope that justice is truly blind and that the outcome of this case isn’t tainted by partisan leanings. We need a fair and unbiased resolution to the charges against former President Trump, and it’s in the best interest of our democracy that the integrity of the judicial process is upheld. Only time will tell if Judge Chutkan can rise above her family history and political leanings to deliver a just verdict.
