Staff ReportsIn a stunning revelation, Donald Trump has once again showcased his savvy geopolitical intuition. The former president admitted that he persuaded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on launching a military strike against Iran. While some see diplomacy, others—especially the globalist elites—might not fully grasp the art of securing peace without unnecessary conflict.
At the crux of this situation is Iran’s nuclear ambitions, which they claim serve peaceful purposes. However, when the foxes are guarding the henhouse, vigilance is a must. Donald Trump knows this. Instead of allowing the Middle East to spiral into a cataclysmic conflict, Trump preferred peaceful pragmatism. Take note: the establishment would likely prefer endless wars to feed their insatiable appetite for chaos, power, and dollars.
🚨 BREAKING: Trump just confirmed he told Israel to not attack Iran.
REPORTER: Did you warn PM Netanyahu against taking action against Iran?
TRUMP: "Well…yes, I did."
"I did. Yeah."
"I said, I don't think it's appropriate right now."
PRESIDENT OF PEACE. pic.twitter.com/iHhDjWdiGN
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 28, 2025
The signals were there—Israel’s growing intentions were no secret. Movement of air munitions and significant air exercises indicated preparations for a strike. Wouldn’t it be reasonable for America’s ally to consult us first? The globalists would have had it otherwise, but real leadership calls for more than just signing off at every request.
Critics and former diplomats who doubted the possibility of an Israeli assault might have misjudged the situation. They rely on the bureaucratic processes that always seem to delay action and pretend that consultation is the only course forward. Yet, real leaders like Trump prove that forceful, timely intervention is sometimes the most humane solution. Why wait until the missiles fly?
Your run-of-the-mill liberal elites may have scoffed at Trump’s dealings with Tehran, but here lies the reality. By halting what could have been a disastrous clash, he saved lives without bending an inch. Instead of appeasement, he’s advocating for concrete agreements with ironclad inspections. There is no trust without verification, only the strategy of a leader who’s unafraid to fight for peace. A question for the skeptics: would they have preferred bombs over diplomacy?
