Staff Reports
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner has thrown a spotlight on a serious concern: the potential connections between the men accused of plotting against Donald Trump and Iran. As alarming as the thought is, Turner, a Republican from Ohio, is pushing the FBI to clearly identify whether Matthew Thomas Crooks or Ryan Routh could indeed have ties to Tehran. After all, recent news indicating Iran’s intentions to harm Trump and those close to him adds to the urgency of the situation.
Turner is not mincing words when he emphasizes that the FBI needs to wrap up its investigations. The stakes are high, and with Iranian plots in the air, it’s only logical to confirm if the two accused men are tied to these nefarious plans. He expressed the necessity for a definitive answer to ensure American citizens understand the full scope of the risk. This isn’t just a game of political chess; it’s about the security of a former president facing threats from foreign adversaries.
House intel chairman demands FBI determine if accused Trump assassins have ties to Iran | Just The News [Better to ask what ties they have to operatives in the US government.] https://t.co/fF4M003Glk
— Tom McGovern (@jefe_viejo) October 8, 2024
Surprisingly, Turner is skeptical that the FBI’s conclusions will come swiftly, especially with the upcoming elections drawing nearer. In his estimation, it’s improbable that they could gather enough concrete evidence to rule out any connections between these suspects and the plot against Trump before November 5. This raises questions about the efficiency of the investigations and whether political agendas are influencing law enforcement operations.
He further called out double standards, pointing out that the Biden administration seems to be more vigorous in addressing cyber threats against Trump’s campaign than the assassination attempts themselves. This disparity doesn’t just demonstrate a lack of seriousness regarding a potential assassination plot, it suggests a worrisome prioritization in the current administration’s agenda. It’s almost as if hacking is deemed a greater concern than a direct threat to a former president.
Turner believes Vice President Harris should be more vocal about the administration’s acknowledgment of a foreign threat seeking to eliminate a political opponent, which should be seen as nothing short of scandalous. The glaring lack of assertive rhetoric from the White House regarding Iranian aggressiveness is concerning. Americans should expect stronger and clearer proclamations against such hostile acts, especially when it involves threats that could be construed as acts of war. In a world filled with chaos, the public needs clarity and a decisive, firm stand from their leaders.
