Gavin Newsom’s recent splash in Vogue — opening with the line that he is “embarrassingly handsome” — shows how the coastal media class outfits the Democratic bench with glossy PR rather than accountability, and conservatives should call it out for what it is: propaganda dressed up as journalism. The profile’s breathless tone has already become a meme among critics who see it as a politically timed pat on the head for a would-be 2028 standard-bearer.
Make no mistake: Vanity magazine profiles are not neutral; they are currency in the progressive celebrity pipeline that helps anointed governors audition for national office. Vogue’s piece reads like a campaign rollout — flattering language, celebrity photography and gentle framing — while leaving the hard questions about homelessness, failing schools, and skyrocketing cost-of-living in California to the side. The media puff piece is a feature, not an obituary for accountability.
On the other side, J.D. Vance is now the sitting vice president of the United States, sworn in alongside President Trump on January 20, 2025, a rapid ascent from his Ohio roots that should remind Americans there are real public servants who know the struggles of working families. Vance’s rise has already been marked by policy fights and populist rhetoric that connect with the heartland — the very voters the left’s coastal royalty tells us to ignore.
Vance has publicly said he’ll “sit down” with President Trump after the 2026 midterms to discuss any future 2028 plans, and that cautious posture should be applauded: a responsible leader focuses on the job at hand and the midterms, not glossy magazine coverlines. That said, the political universe is already circling 2028, and Democrats love to weaponize celebrity profiles into momentum. Conservatives need to be clear-eyed about that strategy.
So is Vance ready to face Newsom and a Vogue-fed media machine? The short answer is: he can be, but only if he sticks to his roots and doubles down on substance over spectacle. While Newsom gets lap-dog profiles and celebrity photogs, Vance owns a story of grit and practical policy — the kind of message that wins the Midwest and the working-class voters who actually decide elections.
If conservatives want a real contest in 2028, we should demand a fight on issues — immigration, energy reliability, family policy, and restoring opportunity — not let the left substitute style for solutions. Vance’s best move is to resist the media’s temptation to play their game, spotlight real results from the administration, and remind Americans which side stands with hardworking families and small towns.
In the end, the choice in 2028 shouldn’t be about who photogenically poses under soft lighting; it should be about who will rebuild American industry, secure our borders, and restore dignity to the forgotten citizens of this country. Conservatives owe it to those voters to make the contest about competence and character, not about who gets the next Vanity Fair or Vogue love letter from the coastal elites.

