Staff ReportsIn today’s chaotic world, the mainstream media has found its new obsession: creating drama out of thin air. This time, they’re fixated on an alleged incident involving Mark Zuckerberg in the sacred halls of the Oval Office. According to some nebulous “sources,” the Meta CEO supposedly wandered into a high-stakes meeting about the F-47 stealth fighter jet—and had the audacity to do it without security clearance. This has been spun as yet another example of what’s wrong with the Trump administration, when the real issue is the media’s relentless fixation on scandal.
White House Responds to Report That Mark Zuckerberg Was 'Asked to Leave' Oval Office Meeting via @WestJournalism https://t.co/wNTLPBP5rT
— SASSYCHICK (@KT07500539) July 2, 2025
There’s no denying that globalist elites like Zuckerberg yearn for influence, cozying up to power wherever it suits their interests. Popping into a crucial national security meeting sounds like another episode in their self-serving saga. But isn’t it interesting how the media leaves out any hint from Zuckerberg or Meta on this alleged expulsion? Selective outrage, anyone? What we see instead is overblown commentary on the informality of Trump’s Oval Office, almost as if punishing him for being a President who doesn’t follow their sanitized script.
The real snake in the grass here isn’t Trump, nor is it some purported ‘chaos’ in his administration. The real drama queens are the journalists who feed us these frothy concoctions of half-truths. They’re quick to label the Oval Office as “bizarro world,” as if to imply that having an open-door policy with world leaders is so outlandish. How foreign a concept it seems to those who are used to the Hollywood-style presidencies of the past, where everything is staged, polished, and utterly fake.
These critics breathe hypocrisy. They’ll never tell you that chaos isn’t a Trump exclusive. JFK and Lincoln had bustling, hectic administrations; both are celebrated. Yet, when Trump acts as a hands-on, active leader, they miraculously forget past precedents, as if amnesia serves their agenda. It’s a classic tactic of shifting narratives, desperate to keep focus off substantive policies and achievements.
In the end, while the leftist media scrambles for another sensational story, perhaps the joke’s really on them. How long can their game of telephone last before it collapses under its own absurdity? One has to wonder: what will they cook up next in this theater of the absurd?
