Staff Reports
A recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump has spotlighted just how far the left is willing to go to silence their opposition. The alleged shooter, Ryan Routh, not only plotted to kill Trump but laid out his deranged thoughts in a manifesto accessible to anyone willing to part with a mere $2.99 on Amazon. Titled “Ukraine’s Unwinnable War: The Fatal Flaw of Democracy, World Abandonment and the Global Citizen,” this work reveals Routh’s reckless disregard for human life, raising alarm bells for anyone who believes in the principles of democracy and civil discourse.
In his convoluted text, Routh drops any pretense of reason and goes straight for the jugular, openly encouraging Iran to assassinate Trump. It appears this disgruntled voter, who previously supported Trump in 2016, had a meltdown over the former president’s wise decision to back out of Barack Obama’s disastrous Iran nuclear deal. Routh’s apparent rationale is baffling: he believes that Trump stands in the way of his vision of a “better world”—one in which tyrannical regimes gain more power. It seems that in the mind of Routh, his political failures validate calls for violence against former President Trump.
THM News: 'You Are Free to Assassinate Trump': What Alleged Trump Shooter Advocated in Rambling Manifesto https://t.co/GSzmCs1QHm
— Marlon East Of The Pecos (@Darksideleader2) September 17, 2024
There’s a distinct element of irony in Routh’s self-identification as a freedom fighter. He packed his bags to fight for Ukraine, but it turns out that even the true defenders of freedom over there saw him for what he was: a delusional misfit with an inflated sense of importance. Rather than becoming a hero, he was sidelined and branded a “wack job” by genuine fighters who know the difference between sacrifice and senseless self-aggrandizement.
This disturbing trend should not go unnoticed. Routh’s actions epitomize the kind of desperation that permeates the leftist psyche in 2024. Motivated by a twisted sense of morality, these individuals appear convinced that violent rhetoric is an acceptable substitution for honest political debate. With the Democrat Party fanning the flames of hatred toward Trump and his supporters, it raises a vital question: how many other weak-minded individuals are lurking in the shadows, ready to unleash their outlandish fantasies in the service of their leftist ideals?
In the lead-up to the election, it’s essential to recognize the potential for even more outrageous behavior. Routh is but one example of a troubling reality: the Democrats, led by figures like Kamala Harris, refuse to change their approach and continue to demonize Trump and his followers. As Trump moves closer to a potential second term, it becomes clearer that he threatens the Democrat apparatus, especially the slush fund that is Ukraine aid—a sacred cow for those seeking to maintain power and influence. Thus, violence against Trump seems to be both a symptom and a predicted outcome of this vitriol.
When voters head to the polls in a few weeks, they must reflect on what kind of leadership they wish to support. It is clear that the Democrats are unwilling to abandon their violent rhetoric, and the potential repercussions of that could lead to more individuals like Ryan Routh. Supporting Trump means standing against an increasingly violent left that sees assassination, rather than debate, as a viable tactic for dealing with political opponents.
