in , , , , , , , , ,

Bagram Betrayal: Veterans Condemn Disastrous U.S. Withdrawal Strategy

They told us it was a withdrawal; what it felt like to veterans and to our Afghan allies was an abandonment. Army master aviator Alan C. Mack — who flew the same dangerous Chinook missions that bought this country time and security for two decades — told Megyn Kelly plainly on her show that the way Bagram was handled was disgraceful and avoidable. Too many Americans who sacrificed for that mission watched the White House turn a strategic asset into a headline.

The facts are simple and damning: U.S. forces slipped out of Bagram Airfield in the dead of night on July 2, 2021, leaving Afghan partners to discover the base was empty hours later. That midnight retreat — shutting off the power and walking away without proper, timely handover — demoralized our partners and sent a signal the Taliban exploited with devastating speed. This was not just a tactical error; it was a breakdown of responsibility at the highest level.

Even worse, the Pentagon later reported that roughly $7.1 billion in U.S.-funded equipment and weapons remained in the country after the collapse, gear that had been provided to Afghan forces and for which the United States never secured proper disposition. Armored vehicles, aircraft, night-vision and communications gear — tools we paid for with American blood and treasure — ended up in the hands of forces now hostile to us. That kind of waste is not the mark of prudent withdrawal; it’s the sign of catastrophic operational failure.

The human cost followed. Analysts and watchdogs warned that abandoning Bagram left detention and security gaps that emboldened extremist groups, and ISIS-K later claimed responsibility for the August 26, 2021, suicide bombing at Kabul’s airport that murdered 13 U.S. service members and scores of Afghan civilians. This isn’t theory — it’s the predictable consequence of ceding ground and failing to secure dangerous facilities before departure. We must call this what it was: policy negligence with lethal results.

The remedy was obvious then and remains obvious now: Bagram should have been held as a secure logistics and evacuation hub until Americans, allies, and sensitive materials were fully accounted for or safely extracted. Military planners repeatedly told Washington a phased, orderly drawdown would prevent just this kind of chaos; instead, politics trumped prudence and left chaos in its wake. Holding key terrain, safeguarding detention facilities, and properly demilitarizing equipment are not radical ideas — they are basic competence, and we were denied them.

Patriots who served and the families of the fallen deserve answers and consequences, not excuses. Congress must continue oversight, veterans’ voices must be central in these hearings, and our commanders must be empowered to prioritize American lives and security over political timelines. And let no one forget the strategic ripple effects: a chaotic retreat hands regional adversaries — including Tehran and its proxies — opportunities to expand influence and menace our interests; America must never shrink from holding ground that protects Americans and our allies.

Written by admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Democrats Embrace Controversy: Tattoo Scandal Underscores Double Standards