admin
Chris Cillizza exploded on X this week after President Donald Trump called into Michael Cohen’s podcast and the two publicly patched things up. Cillizza accused liberal journalists of “platforming” Cohen for clicks — and the reaction was immediate, loud, and not exactly kind.
What Cillizza Said — and Why It Matters
On social media, Cillizza wrote that “All the liberal ‘journalists’ who platformed Michael Cohen because he would bash Trump (and get them clicks and subscriptions) should be ashamed of themselves. This was always going to happen.” That short, angry post lands at the center of a bigger debate: when does covering a critic become cheering for one side? The pivot from “Cohen the enemy” to “Cohen the reconciled friend” makes the whole episode taste like old TV drama — except it’s the press doing the writing and the commercials.
Context: Trump and Cohen Reconciled on the Air
The spark here is the public conversation between President Donald Trump and Michael Cohen, the President’s former personal attorney, on Cohen’s weekend radio/podcast program. Cohen has been a high‑profile critic in the past. Now they’ve publicly signaled a rapprochement, and that flip prompted people to ask why reporters ever gave Cohen so many opportunities to criticize Trump in the first place. It’s a fair question — but the answer is usually more about news judgment and clicks than noble truth-seeking.
Hypocrisy, Media Bias, and a Little Comeuppance
Here’s the punchline nobody in the mainstream press likes: Cillizza himself wrote about and amplified Cohen’s testimony back when he worked at a national network. So the call for shame smells less like moral clarity and more like selective outrage. If the press wants to lecture the public about “platforming,” then fine. But let’s start with consistent standards instead of partisan scorekeeping. The bigger problem isn’t a single guest booking; it’s a media culture that chases narratives that fit their worldview and clicks that pay the bills.
So what’s the lesson? Reporters should do two things: follow the facts, and stop pretending their booking calendars aren’t tilted. Audiences can smell that tilt. When a once‑vocal critic suddenly hugs it out with the subject of their criticism, skepticism isn’t a scandal — it’s journalism. If journalists want respect, they should earn it. Until then, the rest of us will keep pointing out the theater. And yes, we’ll laugh when the critics get a taste of their own headlines.
