admin
A Lynnwood city councilwoman ignited a predictable firestorm this week when video surfaced of her saying, from the dais, that a Pride flag is “more relatable” to her than the American flag — remarks that many veterans and neighbors rightly found offensive and disrespectful. The exchange, captured at a May 4 council meeting, cut straight to the gut of a community that honors service and sacrifice above political trendiness.
Councilmember Isabel Mata went further on camera, saying “I wasn’t even born here” while criticizing Wilcox Park’s display of 27 versions of the U.S. flag and suggesting more “relatable” symbols might better reflect the city’s diversity. Those remarks weren’t a private thought — they were broadcast from a public podium, where officials owe deference to the flag and those who served under it.
The backlash was fast and fierce: hundreds of residents, veterans, and local commenters flooded the council and social channels demanding accountability, with veterans emphasizing the weight and cost behind the Stars and Stripes. This wasn’t a difference of taste; it was a public official diminishing the symbol that binds Americans of every background, including those who paid the ultimate price.
Mata has issued an apology, telling constituents she spoke from a “very personal place” and that her delivery was “clumsy,” and she expressly apologized to veterans for the hurt her words caused. Words and mea culpas are not meaningless, but they must be matched by deeds — a city leader who belittles the flag should explain how she will rebuild trust and demonstrate respect for those who defended our freedoms.
This episode is emblematic of a larger, troubling trend: identity politics elevated above patriotism, and the reflexive urge by some on the left to prioritize symbolism over shared national bonds. The remedy is simple and American — hold your officials to account at the ballot box, insist on public respect for veterans and the flag, and demand that civic leaders unite rather than divide.
