admin
Senate candidate Roy Cooper is finally squirming under a spotlight he helped create. A new searchable database called CooperReleasedHim.com has put fresh numbers and names into the public square, and Republican lawmakers and voters want answers. This isn’t old policy dusted off for politics — it’s a new push to force transparency about who was released under the 2021 pandemic settlement and why so many later reoffended.
New database puts Cooper on the defensive
The CooperReleasedHim.com project claims a list of 4,234 inmates tied to the 2021 NAACP/ACLU settlement — well above the settlement’s 3,500 floor — and reports roughly 2,412 of those people later had arrests or supervision violations. That blast of raw data has powered aggressive campaign ads and a GOP-led legislative subcommittee demanding documents. For a candidate who keeps telling voters he was “tough on crime,” the timing could not be worse. If you sign a binding agreement that produces thousands of early reentry outcomes, you own the consequences — especially when nearly half of the people on the matched list show new charges.
What the numbers show — and what they don’t
We should be clear about two things. First, an independent state study (SPAC) already showed FY2021 releases had a high two-year rearrest rate — about 44% in the sample — and people released many days earlier than scheduled fared worse. Those are hard, official numbers that voters should absorb. Second, not every high‑profile name on campaign flyers was necessarily walked out the door because of the settlement; some cases are messy, some releases were already scheduled, and fact‑checking has undercut one widely cited example. Fine — hard cases can be messy. But messy doesn’t mean harmless. The combination of the public database and SPAC’s findings gives the GOP a powerful, evidence-backed line of attack: lives were lost, violent crimes rose, and the public wasn’t fully told the scope.
Cooper chose a legally binding path others refused
Here’s the political rub: governors in other states resisted or avoided signing a contract that guaranteed a set number of releases. North Carolina’s governor signed a legally binding settlement. That was a choice. Other governors fought the same litigation or found ways to preserve executive discretion. That difference matters to voters who want safe streets and predictable custody decisions. Cooper’s campaign can point fingers at corrections staff now, but signing a settlement that locks in thousands of early reentry outcomes is not a neutral administrative act — it is policy with winners and losers.
Probe, politics, and accountability
Republican legislative leaders have launched a subcommittee, subpoena threats are flying, and the Senate campaign has turned the issue into relentless ad copy. That’s politics, of course, but it’s also how accountability gets forced into light. The public deserves records: the actual lists, custody histories, and clear timelines that show whether a settlement entry changed someone’s release date. If Cooper believes prison officials made all the choices, he should let the records show it. Otherwise, voters will keep asking: did he sign a deal that made our communities less safe — and then dodge responsibility when things went wrong?
In the end, this isn’t just about numbers on a website. It’s about whether elected leaders make hard choices and then own the outcomes. The CooperReleasedHim.com database and the SPAC numbers demand answers. If Cooper wants to run for the Senate on his record, he should expect to defend every part of it under oath, in public, and without political spin. The people of North Carolina deserve nothing less — and if Cooper still wants to pretend otherwise, he can save his creative excuses for the campaign trail.
