admin
FBI Director Kash Patel told Fox News this weekend that the bureau’s new embrace of artificial intelligence helped stop school‑shooting plots in North Carolina and “about half a dozen” other states. He also said he’s boosted the FBI’s use of AI by 605 percent. Those are big claims. They deserve praise if true, and hard questions if not.
What Patel said — and why it matters
Patel’s point is simple and dramatic: AI in the hands of law enforcement can save lives. If the FBI really used AI to triage tips, find threats, and stop attacks on schools, that’s a win for parents and communities. Conservatives should cheer technology that protects children. After years of Washington ignoring common‑sense tools, it’s refreshing to hear an agency boss say he’s modernizing. The phrase “AI in law enforcement” is no longer just theory. Patel put it into practice, or at least he says he did.
Questions that still need answers
That said, the details matter. What does “stopped” mean in each case? Which tools or vendors were used? Were warrants or legal safeguards followed? And how do you even compute a 605 percent increase in use without a baseline? Those are not gotcha questions. They are basic facts Americans deserve. Transparency about arrests, charges, court filings or tamper‑proof timelines would turn a good soundbite into real public accountability.
Support the tool, demand the proof
We can be pro‑safety and pro‑privacy at the same time. Conservatives believe in law and order, and we also believe in limited, accountable government. If the FBI is using AI to stop shooters, publish what you can. Share the metrics and let independent auditors verify the claims. That will silence critics who reflexively distrust any new tech and will reassure families that civil liberties were respected while lives were saved. Yes, demand proof — but do not reflexively oppose innovation that could keep kids alive.
Call for sensible oversight — not politics
Washington loves to politicize everything. That temptation is especially strong around AI. Congress should write clear rules that let local police and the FBI use AI responsibly. Oversight must be real, not performative. Privacy impact assessments, inspector general reviews, and clear definitions of what “prevention” looks like will protect Americans and give law‑enforcement leaders the cover to keep doing the hard work. If Patel’s numbers check out, celebrate. If they don’t, hold him to account. Either way, parents and children deserve the truth.
