Staff Reports
Former Supreme Court clerks raise concerns over conduct of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s alleged lover, Nathan Wade, stating that it casts a suspicious shadow over her prosecution of former President Donald Trump. Documents reveal that Wade was paid $250 per hour while working on the case against Trump, contradicting the claims made by Willis that he was compensated at the same rate as other team members. Fox News host Laura Ingraham highlighted that Wade even billed for 24 hours in a single day. Such irregularities deserve scrutiny and must be resolved before proceeding with the cases against Trump.
The revelation that Wade, a paramour in this sordid tale, earned a higher rate than a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) expert is troubling. It raises the question of whether the prosecution team Willis assembled is truly the “A team” or just a bunch of opportunistic individuals looking to cash in on the high-profile case. One would expect the best legal minds to be involved in such an important matter. Instead, we have concerns about questionable conduct and billing practices that jeopardize the credibility of the prosecution.
‘Certainly questionable’: Fox News host, guest discuss Fani Willis’ alleged lover’s billing https://t.co/7jU5o0Cof1
— Bo Snerdley (@BoSnerdley) January 18, 2024
The indictment against Trump and others includes RICO charges, a serious accusation. But the fact that Wade, who had met with the staff of the Select January 6 Committee for extensive periods, played a significant role in the case raises more red flags. Does this suggest a coordination between the White House and Willis? Such potential political interference undermines the integrity of the judicial process and leaves us with serious doubts about the objectivity of the investigation.
In her address at the Big Bethel AME Church, Willis attempts to deflect criticism by accusing her detractors of playing the race card. This is a classic tactic used by liberals who cry racism whenever they face legitimate scrutiny. It’s a sad state of affairs when instead of addressing genuine concerns, the default response is to accuse others of bigotry. This diversionary tactic does not absolve Willis from answering questions about the conduct and billing practices of her team.
Ultimately, the credibility of this prosecution hangs in the balance. The questionable conduct and billing practices of Fani Willis’s alleged lover, Nathan Wade, cannot be dismissed. These issues must be thoroughly investigated and resolved before proceeding with the case against Donald Trump. The American people deserve a fair and unbiased judicial process, and any doubts regarding the integrity of the prosecution must be addressed. The cloud of suspicion cast over this case cannot simply be brushed aside, especially when the stakes are so high.
