Hershey’s vice president of U.S. retail sales, Stephanie Berman, laid out a familiar but practical story in a recent Forbes interview: use artificial intelligence as a tool to augment boots-on-the-ground retail teams and to sharpen logistics across tens of thousands of stores. This isn’t about lofty Silicon Valley fantasies; it’s about making route planning smarter and freeing salespeople to sell, not chase spreadsheets.
Conservatives should welcome private companies that apply technology to lower costs and improve service for Americans, but we must stay clear-eyed about what the tools actually do. Hershey’s embrace of AI-driven routing and in-store support shows how market forces reward efficiency, not political posturing, and it helps keep prices and waste down while keeping shelves stocked.
What stands out in Hershey’s approach is encouragement of grassroots innovation from sales teams—actual frontline workers suggesting the fixes that matter. That bottom-up model is the opposite of top-down bureaucratic mandates and is exactly the kind of American ingenuity conservatives should defend and amplify.
But let’s not kid ourselves: AI is a tool, not a cure-all. Hershey’s own internal reports emphasize building a strong digital foundation and clean data before unleashing generative models, which is the sober, responsible path any fiscally prudent company should follow. Conservative stewardship means insisting companies prove ROI and operational readiness before spending shareholder and consumer dollars on flashy pilots.
There are real workforce questions that deserve honest answers. Hershey’s Connected Worker initiatives promise augmentation, not replacement, and the right conservative stance is to push for retraining and clear protections so hardworking Americans benefit from productivity gains instead of being discarded by them. Business must be accountable to employees and communities when deploying disruptive technologies.
We should also be wary of concentrated control and the energy and data demands behind sprawling AI systems; efficiency shouldn’t come at the cost of surveillance, hidden costs, or dependency on distant tech monopolies. Conservatives must press for transparency in algorithmic decision-making and for standards that protect small retailers and local workers who are too often steamrolled by “solutions” designed for the global elite.
Hershey’s work shows a sensible blueprint: empower employees, modernize logistics, measure results, and keep humans in the loop. That model aligns with conservative values—responsible innovation, respect for labor, and markets that reward tangible improvements rather than virtue signaling.
If conservatives want to lead on technology policy, start by backing companies that prioritize people and profit over politics, demand rigorous audits of AI’s effects on jobs and prices, and resist calls for heavy-handed regulation that would stifle the very innovation that sustains American competitiveness. Celebrate the wins like Hershey’s, but remain vigilant: technology works best when it serves citizens, not the other way around.

