Jan 6 Protester Sues Biden Admin Over Rights Breaches

In a recent development, a protester from the Jan. 6 incident has taken legal action against the Biden administration. Edward Jacob “Jake” Lang has filed a lawsuit claiming that his constitutional and human rights were violated during his time in prison. Lang, who has spent a significant period in solitary confinement, accuses Attorney General Merrick Garland and Metropolitan Detention Center Deputy Warden Heriberto Tellez of disregarding his rights.

The lawsuit, filed in a Washington, D.C. District Court, alleges that Lang has been continuously held and transferred in a manner that violates both his Constitutional and human rights. Lang’s social media post highlighted his ordeal, including spending time in solitary confinement in a detention center in Brooklyn, New York. Despite laws in New York prohibiting long-term solitary confinement, Lang reportedly endured such conditions, raising concerns about the treatment of individuals involved in the Jan. 6 events.

Lang’s legal battle sheds light on the challenges he has faced since his arrest in 2021. The lawsuit addresses issues such as alleged abuse – mental, physical, and verbal – as well as prolonged solitary confinement without disciplinary charges. Lang’s experiences reflect broader concerns about the treatment of Jan. 6 prisoners and the delays in their legal proceedings, including the right to a speedy trial guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.

The case also brings attention to the repeated transfers and alleged loss of personal belongings and case records during Lang’s time in different facilities. The lawsuit holds Garland accountable for seeking Lang’s pretrial detention and maintaining his incarceration. The situation underscores the need for transparency and fair treatment of individuals involved in legal processes, regardless of the circumstances surrounding their cases.

Lang’s lawsuit against the Biden administration raises important questions about the treatment of individuals involved in the Jan. 6 incident and the broader implications for constitutional rights. As the legal proceedings unfold, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the rights of all individuals, irrespective of their affiliations or backgrounds.

Written by Staff Reports

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Arizona GOP Proposes Voter Decision on Border Bill to Sidestep Governor

Biden Admin and Big Tech Team Up to Silence Conservative Speech Online