Staff Reports
The disintegration of Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign is a sight to behold, reminiscent of a train wreck in slow motion. This month has already brought a series of alarming blows to her ability to secure support from prominent organizations crucial for any Democrat seeking the highest office. The latest shock came when the Teamsters Union—once a reliable ally for Democrats—publicly chose to stand against her, signaling a massive shift in support from a group that historically backed liberal candidates.
The hammer didn’t just drop with the Teamsters; soon after, the firefighters union made headlines by announcing it would not endorse Harris either. It’s hard not to chuckle when considering the implications of this trend. Even Warren Buffett, the investment magnate known for his past affiliations with the Democrats, has seemingly withdrawn support. To top off this cascade of calamities, the left-leaning outlets such as the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post followed suit, further isolating Harris in a crumbling campaign.
'USA Not Today…another mayor national outlet refuses to endorse Kamala Harris' 👇They keep coming 🧐 https://t.co/O0PXTP1yPK
— Onward🇺🇸1776 (@onward1776) October 29, 2024
In another blow to her already flailing aspirations, USA Today chose not to endorse any candidate for the upcoming presidential election. This decision was cloaked in the typical, bureaucratic doublespeak about local decision-making and serving the public. However, it raises eyebrows that USA Today suddenly realizes the need for an “ethical” approach to endorsements just as it becomes clear that Harris’s campaign is barely afloat.
The timing of these announcements suggests that many within the Democratic establishment are jumping ship in fears of a losing candidate. Their sudden commitment to local journalism is an interesting pivot—not to mention a glaring admission that the national Democrats are in disarray. The notion that this is all about “the facts that matter” seems suspect, particularly when one considers the outlandish praise the media heaped upon Harris during the 2020 race. What’s changed? Perhaps the unacceptable nature of the current campaign has finally pushed even the most steadfast supporters away.
The concerning trend among “reputable” organizations to disengage from Harris speaks volumes about her standing within the party. It appears the once-certain political future of Kamala Harris is now a dwindling echo of what could have been. Maybe she needs to rethink her strategy or, dare one say, her entire approach to politics. As the endorsements continue to dry up, the question remains: how much longer can she stay afloat amidst such a storm? All signs point to a far less than victorious path ahead.
