admin
The Los Angeles Unified School District says it needs to fix a $3.6 billion hole in its budget. The school board quietly removed a supplemental “Charter Block Grant” that pays 42 LAUSD‑affiliated charter schools. Parents and teachers are angry, and the board chose to protect big equity and DEI-style programs instead of the charter money. That choice has people asking some honest questions about priorities.
What the district cut — and why it matters
LAUSD’s Fiscal Stabilization Plan zeroed out a local supplement that has been sent to certain affiliated charter schools for years. The district lists about $10 million in cuts for the first year, with another $10 million slated later. For those 42 campuses, that is real money that pays for supervision, counselors and staff. Take away a steady funding stream and schools must cut people, not just paper clips. Superintendent Andres Chait and the board say the move brings consistency to funding rules, but they also knew this would make parents and principals scream.
Parents protested — and with good reason
Parents, students and staff rallied at campuses and outside district headquarters to demand the money back. They warned of layoffs, fewer campus supervisors and worse support for special‑needs students. These are not abstract cuts. When a principal says losing a staff member is like losing family, that is not rhetoric — it is budget reality. Board President Scott M. Schmerelson and district finance chiefs can defend the math, but they should not be surprised when families fight to keep adults on campus.
Why protecting DEI while cutting charters looks backwards
The board explicitly preserved major equity investments like the Black Student Achievement Plan and other SENI funds while letting the charter block grant go. That choice is political, not purely fiscal. If the problem is a multi‑billion shortfall, you do not get to shield expensive central programs and then trim money that pays teachers and safety staff in neighborhood schools. Call it what it is: a political haircut meant to avoid angering certain allies while making other people pay the price. The union-friendly move to protect DEI spending while cutting charter support fuels the suspicion that powerful interests are steering the budget axe.
What the board should do next
LAUSD needs honest priorities and clear answers. If the shortfall is real, the board must do three things: show the public the full fiscal plan and options; consider trimming central programs that do not help kids in class every day; and phase any cuts so schools and parents can plan. Protecting students should be the top line item — not protecting political programs. Superintendent Chait and Board President Schmerelson have a chance to fix this mess by putting students first, restoring charter support or finding real savings at headquarters. If they choose politics over kids, voters and parents will remember who picked ideology over classroom aides.
