admin
Macomb County just dropped another awkward note in Michigan’s lap: its clerk found 236 people who told the county they aren’t U.S. citizens when summoned for jury duty in the third quarter of 2026 — and nine of those names show up as registered voters in the state file, with one person even having voted. That’s the specific development, and it should make every voter who cares about election integrity sit up and ask why our system is letting this happen, however rare the instances may be.
New numbers from Macomb County: what was reported
Macomb County Clerk Anthony Forlini says his office matched jury‑pool self‑reports against Michigan’s Qualified Voter File and found 236 prospective jurors who identified as noncitizens in Q3 2026. Of that group, nine were listed as registered voters and one had voting history in the state’s voter roll. Forlini says he forwarded the list to the state, and he’s been publishing a running tally of these finds for some time. That’s the new, specific development election watchers need to weigh — not fiddle with abstractions.
State pushback, prosecutions, and the bigger picture
Don’t expect a simple story where county finds equal confirmed fraud. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s office has previously reviewed lists from Macomb and said some flagged names were citizens and some were noncitizens, insisting confirmed cases are rare. Meanwhile, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel did bring criminal charges earlier this year against five noncitizens alleged to have voted in 2024. So yes: the system catches things sometimes, and sometimes it doesn’t. With a tight U.S. Senate race between Mike Rogers and Abdul El‑Sayed, these discoveries aren’t just academic — they are political lightning rods and legitimate public‑policy concerns.
Why the jury pool matters and why the method isn’t foolproof
Counties pull jury lists from the Secretary of State’s driver‑license and ID records, which include lawful noncitizens. Prospective jurors are asked if they are citizens, so that self‑report becomes the source for Forlini’s list. Critics argue those answers aren’t a perfect way to find ineligible registrations, and state audits say confirmed noncitizen voting remains rare compared with total ballots cast. Fine. But rare isn’t an excuse for shrugging. If you can find nine registered voters among 236 self‑reported noncitizens, you owe the public answers about how the match was made and what steps were taken afterward.
What voters should demand next
Transparency, quick audits, and common‑sense fixes. Michigan’s Secretary of State should publicly say whether it received the Q3 list, what it found, and whether any registrations were canceled or referred for prosecution. The Attorney General should update the public on any active cases tied to these matches. And lawmakers should require clearer cross‑checks between jury summons data and the Qualified Voter File so errors don’t linger. Call it accountability, call it sanity — voters just want to know their elections are clean. If officials won’t act fast and plainly, voters should assume the worst and demand better. After all, democracy isn’t the kind of thing you put on “maybe later” status.
