Actor Rainn Wilson stirred the pot this week when he told a Fox News Digital camera that both parties play favorites when deciding what counts as disqualifying behavior. He used the growing controversy around Maine Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner’s Nazi-style chest tattoo to make a simple point: the media and partisan allies often bend the rules for their team and howl for blood when it’s the other side.
Wilson Calls Out Media and Democratic Hypocrisy
In the Fox News segment, Rainn Wilson didn’t mince words. He said “it’s the hypocrisy that gets me the most,” arguing that critics pounce when the suspect behavior belongs to the other side but look the other way when it comes to allies. That’s a blunt observation, and it lands — because the Platner story is a clear test case of how fast the left and the press will forgive their preferred candidates.
What the Platner Tattoo Revealed
The tattoo at the center of this storm resembles a Totenkopf, the skull symbol linked to Nazi SS units. The image first surfaced in archival footage and was later addressed by Platner, who said the ink came from a drunken episode while he was in the Marines and that he covered it up. Still, his critics — and plenty of concerned voters — see the symbol as disqualifying, while many top Democrats have stuck with him nonetheless.
Why This Matters for the Maine Senate Race
Platner is now the Democratic nominee in Maine and will face Senator Susan Collins (R‑ME). That elevates the stakes. When high-profile Democrats like Senator Elizabeth Warren, Representative Ro Khanna, and Senator Bernie Sanders offer support despite this controversy, it raises a question voters should ask out loud: do partisan loyalties now override basic standards for public officials? Rainn Wilson’s jab shoves that question into the open.
Make no mistake — hypocrisy on both sides deserves calling out. But the left and the mainstream press getting defensive over a candidate who shows a Nazi-linked symbol while demanding purity from the other team is a spectacle worth watching. Voters in Maine and everywhere should want consistent standards, not double standards. If pundits want moral clarity, they should try applying it evenly — and if they won’t, voters have the final say at the ballot box.

