admin
Representative Bennie Thompson (D‑Miss.) told parents to “pass on a Trump account” after the White House rolled out its high‑profile launch of the new child investment program. The administration marked the rollout with an Oval Office bell‑ringing moment and Treasury officials standing beside President Trump. Thompson’s short post on X dragged out the old Trump University $25 million settlement as his reason to distrust a program that seeds children’s futures.
What Rep. Thompson said — and why it landed
Thompson wrote bluntly on X, “It’s safe to say, I would pass on a Trump account. Trump University already taught us what happens when his name is on the brochure. Does a $25 million settlement ring a bell?” That line got instant traction because it was timed to the administration’s rollout. If your political response to a free $1,000 starter deposit for newborns is to tell moms and dads to decline it, you are choosing partisan theater over kids’ bank accounts.
Why Trump Accounts matter for families and generational wealth
The program seeds accounts for eligible newborns with a federal deposit and allows parents, family members or employers to add up to $5,000 a year in tax‑advantaged contributions invested in a broad market index. Officials say that modest annual saving plus compound returns could turn a $1,000 starter into life‑changing sums by adulthood. This is about building generational wealth, not a campaign slogan. Every parent who says “no thanks” is handing a head start back to the other side.
Michael and Susan Dell’s pledge and how the program works
Private philanthropy is already stepping up. Tech philanthropists Michael and Susan Dell pledged roughly $6.25 billion to seed accounts for younger children in lower‑median‑income areas with about $250 each. The Dell gift is meant to jumpstart children who might otherwise miss out. That public‑private mix should be celebrated, not smeared with old lawsuits unrelated to the structure or benefits of this savings plan.
Politics vs. kids: the bottom line
Make no mistake: this fight is political. Democrats like Thompson can mock the branding all they want, but voters should see the choice plainly — accept a seeded account that can grow for your child or listen to partisan advice that leaves them worse off. If opponents worry about taxes, regulations, or the long run, fine — debate that in public. But telling parents to refuse free money for their kids today reads like placeholding for dependency, not leadership. Take the account, teach your kids to save, and let the politics come later.
