admin
This week a conservative outlet put Roy Cooper’s long‑settled defamation lawsuit back into the headlines, reminding North Carolina voters that his first statewide campaign ended in a legal settlement and a formal apology. The story is being repurposed for the 2026 U.S. Senate race, where Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Roy Cooper will face Republican U.S. Senate candidate Michael Whatley. That re‑reporting matters because it raises questions about campaign honesty, accountability, and the people who run these operations.
What actually happened in the 2000 Attorney General race
Back in the 2000 Attorney General campaign, a TV ad claimed a lawyer associated with the Boyce family had “charged $28,000 per hour” in a taxpayer lawsuit. The underlying case involved Gene Boyce, not Dan Boyce, and the $28,000 figure was not a true hourly rate. The Boyces sued for defamation. The case wound through appeals for years and, as a trial loomed, Cooper’s campaign settled. The settlement included a $75,000 payment (borne by the campaign’s insurer), mediator fees, and a written apology that said the ad was wrong and apologized to the Boyce family.
Why the story is back now — and why voters should care
The recent article revived those settled facts as campaign fodder in the 2026 Senate race. It highlights Cooper’s deposition testimony showing he edited the ad language and allowed the more explosive claim to run. That’s not just an old political squabble. It is a record showing a high‑stakes statewide campaign ran a false claim, fought the suit for years, and only apologized under pressure. Voters deserve to know whether the same team and tactics that helped elect Cooper statewide are active again in his Senate bid. Reports link some longtime advisers to both eras, though specific roles from 2000 should be checked against primary records.
What to demand from candidates and reporters
Call it old news if you like, but facts don’t go away because a campaign won. An apology and a $75,000 settlement are not the same thing as accountability. Voters should press the Cooper campaign to explain the record in plain terms and confirm who ran and approved those ads. Reporters should pull the settlement and deposition records and stop trading in blurbs and innuendo. If a candidate’s first statewide run produced a defamation settlement, that should be part of the informed picture voters get before they mark their ballots.
In short, this is a reminder that campaign shortcuts and smear ads have consequences — even if those consequences arrive quietly and years later. The 2026 Senate race will be fought on message and trust. That makes the resurfacing of Cooper’s defamation settlement fair game. Voters should watch who answers questions clearly, who apologizes without being forced, and who wants power without owning past mistakes.
