admin
California’s Senate Elections Committee just punted on a simple idea: don’t let registered sex offenders run for public office. AB 2753, a bill that sailed through the Assembly without opposition, was rejected in committee after members complained it was too broad. Voters who worry about safety in their towns are left wondering why lawmakers chose legal hair-splitting over common sense.
The committee’s flip-flop on AB 2753
AB 2753, authored by Assemblywoman Esmeralda Soria, would have barred anyone required to register as a sex offender from qualifying for state or local elective office. That sounds straightforward after a registered sex offender announced a run for Fresno City Council and made parents nervous. The Assembly passed the bill unanimously. Then the five-member Senate committee effectively killed it with two yes votes, one no, and two abstentions — not exactly a full-throated defense of public safety.
“Too broad” became the refuge of convenience
Committee members warned the registry is messy: it covers three tiers, some entries are old, and some reflect laws that have changed. State Sen. Scott Wiener warned about unintended consequences like “Romeo and Juliet” cases being swept in. Fine — reasonable lawmaking weighs civil-rights concerns. But here’s the rub: lawmakers used that argument to stop a clear safety measure instead of fixing it. Saying a bill is imperfect is not the same as protecting kids and communities.
A narrower bill was ready — why not take it?
At the same hearing, a narrower approach moved forward. Lawmakers advanced a separate measure that targets people with felony sexual assault or human-trafficking convictions. That’s the sensible compromise: protect the public from the worst offenders while avoiding retroactive punishments for minor or historical cases. If the committee feared overbreadth, it could have amended AB 2753 or adopted the felony-focused language immediately. They didn’t. Politics and paralysis beat practical policy.
This isn’t about vengeance. It’s about trust. Voters expect elected leaders to put community safety first and to close obvious loopholes when they appear. Fresno’s scare should have been the wake-up call it was, not an excuse for legislative theater. If lawmakers want to avoid looking weak on crime, they should pass a focused ban that disqualifies serious sexual predators from holding office — and stop hiding behind technicalities while parents worry.
