admin
Brian Morrissey, the General Counsel at the Department of the Treasury, quietly resigned this week — and the timing could not be more eyebrow-raising. His departure came the same day the Department of Justice unveiled a $1.776 billion “Anti‑Weaponization Fund” tied to the settlement of President Trump’s suit against the IRS. Morrissey has not explained why he left, and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche says he doesn’t know either. That leaves a lot of unanswered questions and a lot of room for skepticism.
What the government announced — and who signed off
The Justice Department’s new fund is to be financed from the federal Judgment Fund and overseen by a five‑person commission appointed by the Attorney General. The main settlement documents were signed by Associate Attorney General Stanley E. Woodward Jr. and IRS Chief Executive Officer Frank J. Bisignano. A subsequent one‑page addendum, signed by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, broadly bars the IRS from pursuing tax examinations of President Donald J. Trump and related parties for returns filed before the settlement date. Treasury is listed as the agency responsible for creating and certifying the fund’s account — a job that would have touched the office Morrissey ran under Secretary Scott Bessent.
Why Morrissey’s exit matters
General Counsel at Treasury is not a ceremonial title. That office handles legal sign‑offs on payments and the kind of certifications tied to a Judgment Fund account. For that official to leave, without comment, the same day one of the most unusual settlements in recent memory becomes public is, at the least, bad optics. At worst it suggests coordination or after‑the‑fact fixes that deserve a full airing. The use of the Judgment Fund for a politically charged payout — combined with a one‑page addendum that appears to foreclose future IRS exams of the president and affiliates — raises separation‑of‑powers and appropriations questions. Those aren’t abstract legal puzzles; they go to whether the government treats powerful people differently from everyone else.
Don’t accept “coincidence” as an answer
Acting Attorney General Blanche has said he doesn’t know why Morrissey left and called it possibly a coincidence. That answer will not satisfy taxpayers or members of both parties who are asking for documents and clear explanations about who negotiated every piece of this deal. Congress should demand the full record: the settlement, the addendum, the Treasury certifications, and communications among DOJ, the IRS, and Treasury legal offices. The inspector general and appropriate oversight committees should be allowed to follow the paper trail. If this was aboveboard, transparency will prove it. If it wasn’t, secrecy will only make the problem worse.
We are owed straight talk and clear records. The American people deserve to know whether this settlement and the anti‑weaponization fund were crafted by the rule of law or by backroom elbow‑rubbing. Brian Morrissey’s sudden departure is a red flag that should trigger answers, not excuses. If Washington wants to keep our trust, it will provide them — and quickly.
