admin
President Donald Trump just signed an executive order telling the executive branch to stop saying “Artificial Intelligence” or “AI” and to call it “Super Intelligence” or “SI” instead. The order asks the White House science office to write proposed legislative language within 60 days to define the term in federal law. What sounds like a branding move is actually a policy push with real follow-up steps for agencies and Congress.
What the executive order actually does
The order says that, where the law allows, executive-branch documents, reports, websites, and public statements should use “Super Intelligence” and the acronym “SI” instead of “Artificial Intelligence” or “AI.” It doesn’t magically rewrite statutes. Instead, it directs the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology to work with agency heads and deliver proposed statutory language within 60 days. So this is more than a press line — the White House wants a path to change how federal law talks about these technologies.
Why the president is making the change
On stage, the president argued that the word “artificial” makes the technology sound fake and small, and that “super” better captures its power and promise. That’s marketing, sure, but it’s also a political choice. The administration is trying to set the tone: highlight American innovation, push back on heavy-handed rules, and position the U.S. as the leader in tech. If you like bold branding and less regulation, this is the kind of move you cheer for. If you prefer precision over pep rallies, you might roll your eyes.
Practical limits and why experts are uneasy
Here’s the practical truth: an executive order can set government style and policy for the executive branch, but it cannot unilaterally change federal statutes. Many laws and rules already use “artificial intelligence” as a defined term. Swapping the label while keeping the old definitions could create confusion. And for the tech nerds in the room: “superintelligence” already means something very specific in AI safety circles — a hypothetical system that far outthinks humans. Rebranding everyday AI as “Super Intelligence” is going to rile up some wonks and produce a lot of eye-rolls in the comment threads.
What to watch next
Keep an eye on the science office’s proposed language in the next 60 days. That text will show whether this is mostly a cosmetic change or a real legal rewrite. Agencies will also have to update style guides and maybe fix regulations that use older terms. Congress could step in to clarify definitions — and they should. If Republicans want to turn this from a catchy slogan into smart, pro-growth policy, now is the time to push for clear statutory language that protects innovation while avoiding needless confusion.
At the end of the day, this is classic Washington theater with a policy tail. It’s bold, it’s headline-grabbing, and it forces a debate nobody asked for — about words and who gets to choose them. Fine. If the result is stronger American leadership in technology and clearer laws that favor growth over fear, the theatrics will have been worth it. If not, someone will be busy changing style guides for a very long time.
