Staff Reports
A prominent legal scholar named Jonathan Turley thinks that the Manhattan District Attorney, Alvin Bragg, is actually helping former President Donald Trump by bringing a case against him. This case is about a $130,000 payment that Trump made to a person named Stormy Daniels. A judge in New York has ordered Trump to attend the trial for this case, which means he can’t go to another important court hearing about presidential immunity.
Turley believes that Bragg’s prosecution might end up supporting Trump’s argument for immunity, which is a protection from certain legal actions. This legal expert thinks that having Trump face charges in New York could show the Supreme Court why presidents should have some level of protection for their actions while in office. He suggests that there should be a middle ground where presidents are given some form of legal shield for their official duties.
Look at this news article from The Daily Caller: Jonathan Turley Says Alvin Bragg Is Making Trump’s Immunity Case ‘For Him’ https://t.co/PX8SUiRG9J
— RedState (@BordersUSA) April 25, 2024
Another prosecutor, Jack Smith, has brought charges against Trump for his actions after the 2020 election. Some people, like Andy McCarthy, say that these charges are driven by political motives rather than legal concerns. They believe that prosecutors are rushing the case to try to hurt Trump before the next election. McCarthy thinks that this political pressure is unfair to the court and could influence their decision-making process negatively.
In a conservative view, it seems like some Democrats are using legal means to target Trump for political gain, rather than purely seeking justice. This behavior could set a dangerous precedent for future presidents if they can be constantly pursued through the courts by partisan prosecutors. It is essential for the justice system to remain impartial and focused on upholding the law, rather than being swayed by political agendas.
