In a recent decision by the U.N. General Assembly, a resolution was passed to grant new “rights and privileges” to “Palestine,” with a call to the Security Council to consider allowing the Palestinian state to become a full member of the United Nations. The vote resulted in 143 in favor, 9 against, and 25 abstentions. The United States, along with Israel and several other countries, opposed the resolution.
Watch: Israeli UN Ambassador Gilad Erdan Gives an Epic Response to the UN Approving a Palestinian Enhanced Membership https://t.co/1sBaqMMLRd
— Ben Owen (@hrkbenowen) May 11, 2024
The Israeli Ambassador to the U.N., Gilad Erdan, strongly rejected the vote, expressing emotional dismay and concern over the disregard for the U.N. Charter. Ambassador Erdan conveyed his disapproval by symbolically shredding a copy of the U.N. Charter, emphasizing the detrimental impact of the decision.
He highlighted his concerns about the potential rise to power of Hamas in a future Palestinian state and the normalization of terrorist organizations within the United Nations. Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz also referred to the decision as a “prize for Hamas,” reinforcing the underlying concerns about the implications of the resolution.
U.S. Deputy Ambassador Robert Wood reiterated the U.S. support for Palestinian statehood, contingent upon ensuring Israel’s safety. The decision was seen as a reflection of the existing biases within the U.N. and the implications of granting recognition to entities associated with terrorism.
The U.N. resolution provoked significant political and emotional reactions, raising questions about the future path for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the role of the United Nations in addressing such complex international issues.