admin
California parents and taxpayers are waking up to something obvious: if students arrive on college campuses with straight-A transcripts but can’t do middle-school math, something in K–12 has gone badly wrong. A UC Berkeley math professor’s blistering op‑ed — backed by a growing faculty petition — put this mismatch on the front burner. The debate now centers on whether test‑blind admissions, pandemic learning loss, or plain old grade inflation is to blame.
What Berkeley professors are warning about
UC Berkeley math professor Zvezdelina Stankova wrote that classroom diagnostic tests show many incoming students lack basic skills. She wrote, in stark terms, that “some students are five to eight years behind in mathematics.” That alarm has sparked open letters from faculty across the University of California system demanding a re‑examination of the test‑blind admissions policy. This is the new development — professors are not whispering in hallways anymore. They are saying students who sailed through high school with perfect GPAs are arriving unready for college calculus.
Grade inflation, SAT removal, or both?
News outlets are pointing to UC application figures that reportedly show the number of applicants claiming flawless GPAs roughly doubled over a decade. That statistic is headline‑friendly, but it needs careful parsing: weighted GPAs, self‑reports, and different school scales can inflate numbers. Still, when UC stops looking at SAT or ACT scores, one objective yardstick disappears. Combine that with pandemic learning loss and administrative pressure to pass students, and you get a system that rewards badges over real learning. Call it grade inflation, call it a policy failure — either way, the result is the same: colleges scramble to teach fractions to supposed calculus students.
What state tests actually show
Official California state test results tell a mixed story. Tests show some recovery from the pandemic, but big gaps remain: less than half of students meet grade‑level standards in reading and only a bit more than a third meet math standards. Those CAASPP numbers show that problems are not invented in Berkeley classrooms; they are statewide. So the finger‑pointing should not stop at universities. K–12 leaders, districts, and state officials share responsibility for letting standards slip while shiny GPAs keep climbing.
Fixes conservatives should push for now
First, bring back objective measures in admissions: restore SAT/ACT consideration or adopt a verified, transparent alternative. Second, require transcript verification and standardize how GPAs are reported to prevent gaming through weighted courses. Third, hold schools accountable for real proficiency, not participation trophies — fund tutoring, summer math camps, and clear remediation that actually works. Finally, expand school choice so parents can escape failing systems. If we want college readiness and higher math proficiency, we must reward honest assessment and real learning, not inflated report cards and feel‑good policies.
