admin
Virginia’s political circus nearly hit a new low this week when word leaked that Democrats were even talking about forcing out state Supreme Court justices to get a friendlier ruling on a disputed congressional map. The rumor met a quick and proper end when Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell called the idea “too extreme” and said it “will not be happening.” Good. Some lines shouldn’t be crossed, even in politics — and this one smelled like a power grab from a mile away.
The proposal on the table: lower the retirement age
Here’s what people were whispering about: change the mandatory retirement age for Virginia Supreme Court justices so current judges would be forced off the bench, then refill those seats with loyal appointees who would bless the Democrats’ gerrymandered map. The map in question was widely described as a 10–1 plan that would hand Democrats a massive edge in the U.S. House. The idea first showed up in a published legal memo and then, according to reporting, was discussed on private calls. It sounded nakedly partisan then — and it sounds nakedly partisan now.
Surovell shuts it down — Democrats head to the U.S. Supreme Court instead
When the state Supreme Court threw out the referendum that approved the new map, Democrats had a choice: respect the rule of law or try something drastic. Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell chose to end the fever dream publicly, calling the forced‑retirement scheme impractical and extreme. Instead, state Democratic leaders including Speaker Don Scott and Attorney General Jay Jones filed an emergency application asking the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision. So they punted to the courts rather than try to remake the court itself. That’s the smarter play — and the only one that might actually stand a chance of legal traction.
Why the “nuclear” option was never realistic
Beyond being ethically bankrupt, the retirement‑age idea was doomed on the facts. Virginia election officials warned that the calendar for primaries, ballot orders and absentee ballots leaves almost no time for multi‑step legislation and appointments before ballots must be set. Legal mechanics matter too: changing retirement rules is technically possible, but it takes votes, time and no small measure of political will. The public backlash would be huge. Even Democratic operatives who floated the plan publicly quickly backpedaled when pressed. In short: theater, not a plan.
This episode should be a cautionary tale. Voters can smell when a party is trying to rewrite the rules to win. Republicans won’t apologize for calling out a power play. Democrats are right to head to the U.S. Supreme Court if they believe the state court misapplied federal law — that’s the right forum for a federal claim. But trying to force judicial retirements as a shortcut to victory? No. The people of Virginia deserve maps drawn by law, not by last‑minute legislative stunts. Let the courts sort the legal fight. And let sane politicians keep their hands off the judicial bench.
