Amidst ongoing tensions in the Middle East, it has been brought to light that Maher Bitar, a key individual in President Joe Biden’s administration, has strong ties to the group Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and has exhibited pro-Palestine activism. Bitar, who currently serves as the National Security Council Coordinator for Intelligence and Defense Policy, was an active participant in SJP during his time at Georgetown University. This revelation has sparked concerns among conservative circles, as SJP is funded by Islamic groups with connections to Hamas and has been involved in violent protests and harassment of Jewish students on college campuses.
SJP’s ties to Islamic groups that provided support to Hamas leaders have raised alarms within conservative circles. The organization has been involved in violent protests in support of Hamas and has been linked to the harassment of Jewish students at universities across the United States. Bitar’s involvement with SJP during his college years has raised questions regarding his current role in shaping the Biden administration’s policies towards Israel and Palestine.
I still vividly remember the morning of 9/11/2001. We've fallen quite a way to be here now.
Biden Regime supporting terror.
Unthinkable. https://t.co/z9QfeIr8pO
— Steve B. US (@PatriotSGTUSMC) May 13, 2024
The revelation of Bitar’s past ties to SJP has fueled further concerns among conservatives, as the group has been known for its anti-Israel sentiments and has been linked to supporting terrorism. American Muslims for Palestine, a group that funds SJP, has offered training on how to support Palestinian causes while walking the line between activism and providing support for terrorism. Conservative voices have expressed alarm at the implications of individuals with such ties holding influential positions within the current administration.
Additionally, the involvement of individuals with connections to SJP and its ties to Islamic groups with links to Hamas has led to heightened scrutiny of the Biden administration’s approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Conservatives have raised concerns about the potential influence of individuals with pro-Palestine leanings in shaping the administration’s policies, particularly in light of recent developments and ongoing tensions in the region. As conservatives continue to monitor and analyze the implications of these revelations, the role of individuals with ties to groups like SJP in shaping the administration’s approach to the Middle East remains a topic of significant concern within conservative circles.