admin
The United Nations General Assembly this week adopted an African‑led, non‑binding resolution called “Correct the Map” that urges countries and institutions to use equal‑area map projections — like the Equal Earth projection — so Africa looks the size it really is. The vote was 164 in favor, one against (the United States), with six abstentions. This is a symbolic but loud rebuke of the old Mercator maps that make Greenland look like a continent and Africa look small.
What the U.N. actually voted to do
The text encourages governments, schools, the U.N. and tech companies to prefer equal‑area maps in places where size matters — textbooks, official documents and educational tools. The resolution is non‑binding, so it can’t make anyone redraw their maps by law. Still, supporters from the African Union and Togo, which led the push, say it is about “cognitive justice” and correcting centuries of visual distortion that shaped how people see the world.
Why the United States voted no
The lone U.S. “no” vote was blunt: the U.S. envoy called the measure part of a “larger and more radical ideological project” and said the General Assembly was filling its agenda with distractions — “barnacles,” in her words. That criticism landed because the U.N. did just that: debate map projections while real crises, wars, and international threats go unresolved. You can argue about the art of cartography, but doing it at the expense of the body that should focus on peace and security looks like a choice of optics over outcomes.
Symbolism vs. substance — and the practical fallout
Make no mistake: showing Africa at its true scale matters for teaching and for common sense. Mercator was built for sailors, not schoolchildren. But swapping map projections is largely symbolic. It won’t feed the hungry, stop wars, or fix corrupt schools. What it will do is add another layer of international activism to UN work — and pressure tech platforms, atlas publishers, and ministries of education to change graphics. Some countries abstained because equal‑area examples showed disputed territories in ways they found objectionable, which shows the technical headaches that follow symbolic votes.
Bottom line — watch the follow‑through
The real test is not the vote but what happens next. France already signaled it will drop Mercator for official uses, and Togo and the African Union plan outreach to UNESCO and tech firms. If big platforms start changing default map views, the resolution will have influence beyond symbolism. Until then, the U.N.’s map crusade reads like a feel‑good photo op: clever and harmless if done well, but a poor substitute for doing the heavy lifting the world still needs. If the U.N. wants to fix education and fairness, let’s hope it doesn’t think redrawing map projections is the full answer — or its to‑do list will keep growing—and so will the barnacles.
