admin
West Virginia lawmakers aren’t playing games. After months of written back-and-forth, the House Government Organization Committee has formally asked Flock Safety to show up on the record at an interim meeting on Nov. 9. Lawmakers want straight answers about whether Flock employees ever accessed camera footage they shouldn’t have, which foreign contractor the company uses, and how often the license‑plate readers produce false matches.
Lawmakers Demand Answers — On the Record
House Government Organization Chairman Chris Phillips and delegates including Tristan Leavitt, Patrick Lucas and Ryan Browning made plain they are tired of vague assurances. Their letter says Flock’s written responses left key questions unanswered, and the committee has set deadlines and warned it may use compulsory process or subpoenas if needed. That’s not a stunt. It’s oversight — the kind conservatives used to like when it protected citizens from unchecked power, whether from government or from private tech firms acting like mini‑governments.
Why This Matters: Privacy, Policing, and Public Trust
These cameras are not a harmless gadget on a streetlight. Flock’s automated license plate readers (ALPR) collect a lot of movement data. Courts and senators are paying attention: a federal judge in Oklahoma called warrantless retrospective searches of ALPR networks “a type of indiscriminate mass surveillance,” and Congress has held hearings. Law enforcement has argued these tools help catch criminals. Fine. But help must come with rules. West Virginians deserve both safety and privacy — not one at the expense of the other.
Flock’s Answers So Far: Not Enough
Flock did send multi‑page responses and promises: that standard retention is seven days, that it doesn’t use facial recognition, and that customers control data sharing. The company also says its central database hasn’t been breached and that only a limited exposure of camera streams occurred in the past. Problem is, written pages and press releases don’t replace on‑the‑record answers and audit logs. When a company offers private briefings instead of public testimony, it looks like a magician trying to keep the rabbit in a hat.
What West Virginians Should Watch For
The Nov. 9 hearing could be a turning point. Watch whether Flock confirms who will testify, whether the company finally hands over audit logs and details on third‑party vendors, and whether lawmakers move to draft concrete limits — on retention, cross‑agency searches, and warrantless retrospective lookups. If Flock won’t be transparent, the committee has every right to subpoena. Local control, clear rules, and public accountability should be the bottom line. Citizens and cops both benefit when technology has guardrails — and when companies stop treating our privacy like an optional feature.
