Staff Reports
A recent report has shed light on the involvement of CIA contractors in the controversial letter signed by 51 individuals, including CIA Director Gina Haspel, labeling reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop as a potential “Russian information operation.” According to the report, at least two signatories were active CIA contractors at the time of signing.
This revelation adds a new layer to the discourse surrounding Hunter Biden’s laptop, which allegedly contained evidence of an influence peddling scheme involving his father, Joe Biden, during the 2020 presidential election. The signed letter was seen as a strategic move between the Biden campaign and the intelligence community.
Read "Two Biden laptop letter signers were CIA contractors, agency brass knew of effort' on SmartNews: https://t.co/H9JNVBK8U6
— AnnmarieG (@AnnmarieGorda) June 26, 2024
Former CIA Director Michael Morell’s testimony revealed that a phone call from a Biden campaign official triggered the effort to draft the letter, casting doubts on the political motivations behind it. The report also highlights that Morell and another official were on active contracts with the CIA when the statement was published, raising concerns about the agency’s direct involvement.
Despite claims from signatories that they did not have access to classified information when asserting Russian involvement in the Hunter Biden laptop saga, the report found that some individuals, including Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley, were indeed on the CIA’s payroll as contractors at the time of the statement’s release.
Furthermore, the report implicates senior CIA leadership, including Gina Haspel, stating that they were aware of the Hunter Biden statement before its approval and publication. This revelation suggests that the CIA had the opportunity to properly vet the statement but did not take adequate measures to do so.
The report’s findings underscore the risks associated with potential politicization within the federal government and raise questions about the integrity of the intelligence community’s involvement in sensitive political matters.
