Staff Reports
CNN host Abby Phillip had a complete meltdown while reporting on the election of Javier Milei in Argentina. She labeled him a “far-right populist” who shares the same anger as Donald Trump. Phillip’s segment focused on the rise of conservative, populist governments around the world, which she deemed as “far right”. She mentioned that this wave of populism has benefited conservatives in countries like the U.S., Brazil, and Hungary.
WATCH: CNN Host Melts Down Over Javier Milei's Election: 'He Shares Trump's Anger!'
Damn right he does!!https://t.co/TWJ70zrBRB
— Sheri™ (@FFT1776) November 21, 2023
Phillip tried to paint Milei as an extremist by playing a clip of him speaking with Tucker Carlson. In the clip, Milei criticized the liberals in his country, saying that they believe they are superior to the average population. However, Phillip failed to provide any nuance or in-depth analysis of Milei’s positions.
Milei is actually pro-LGBT rights, anti-abortion, and supports legalized drug use and prostitution. These positions show that he has some nuanced views that are worth exploring in a fair and unbiased manner. It is unfair to simply label him as “far right” without looking at the full picture.
Phillip also compared Milei to other “far right” politicians like Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil and Viktor Orbán of Hungary. However, she failed to acknowledge the differences between these politicians and their specific policies. Milei’s emphasis on economic conservatism sets him apart from Orbán’s socially conservative policies.
Phillip concluded her segment by suggesting that the rise of right-wing populism is an export from the United States. This is a biased and misleading statement. While it is true that President Trump’s victory in 2016 had an impact on the global political landscape, it is unfair to solely attribute the rise of populism to the United States. Many countries have their own unique political dynamics and reasons for the growth of populism.
Overall, Phillip’s segment was filled with biased labeling and lacked the necessary nuance and analysis to properly understand the global rise of conservative, populist governments. It is important to approach these topics with an open mind and provide a fair representation of the various perspectives involved. Unfortunately, Phillip’s segment fell short of this standard.
